NYRA been a bad neighbor. NYRA hasn't helped the surrounding stores and businesses. NYRA doesn't care about Elmont. These are the words of our locally elected representatives in Albany.
What can we say about their oversight on NYRA?
Probably the same things.
Truth is, NYRA isn't the typical bad neighbor; but one that got lazy because no one bothered to watch them. Their hands got caught in the cookie jar, and they vouch for change; and perhaps it is for the better. They've been there for over 50 years. In the early 1900s, that plot of land was up for sale. The mostly rural setting was worried, that another large plot of land (600 acres at the time), would be sold to add another cemetery in the community.
Fortunately, the likes of Belmont and Morgan, bought the land, back then known as the Oatlands. There was a Tudor-Gothic Mansion surrounded by "ancient trees" and where the Turf and Field Club remained till 1956.
1903, in part to immigrants (from Italy, Poland and Ireland) helped to build Belmont Park. Many of these immigrants later stayed and helped formed the first suburbia, and Elmont. So from its commencement in 1905 to 1965, it was the Westchester Racing Association that owned the property, led by Belmont II.
It was in 1965, that New York State, decided in order to provide a competitive and controlled (and the best) racing in America, a single entity should control the four major racing tracks in New York. Thus the Greater Racing Association of New York was formed. They purchased the shares and deeds of the 4 tracks. One year later, they become known as its current name, New York Racing Association (NYRA).
By 1966, NYRA was in full flight, and "modernizing" the tracks at Belmont and Aqueduct. The historic mansion was demolished, and big giant "ancient trees" were cleared to make way. However, the "old tree" remained, giving us a glimmer as to what this land was once before.
Thanks to NYRA, we were able to witness, the glorious racing of Secretariat, the tragic end of Ruffian, Seabiscuit cross the country in train to race, the record of the largest attendance at a sporting event, and the honor of hosting the first sporting event in the US, after the tragedy of 9-11.
With its history, lore and glamor, from the place where US Air Mail first took flight, where the Wright Brothers held their International Air Flight Competition, to where the French King sought asylum from political persecution. It is a place, where others would be jealous of what it means.
The 600 acres once known as the Oatlands, and now Belmont Park, is no longer 600 acres. Its Southwest corner, converted to a city park, its northwest corner, converted to an Elementary School, its Southeastern corner, converted to a small police hub, and its western corner having the Cross Island Expressway, and a train station. Nevertheless, it remains being 430 acres, give or take.
Belmont history and lore has been forgotten. Forgotten by even the politicians who swore to seek out what is best for our community. When approached with the idea of adding a museum, to attract visitors, restore and reunite the community; we got the rude response, "when are we going to be done speaking." Needless to say, this came from the same individual who said, "Who's going to pay for the traffic light," in regard to a dangerous place on Hempstead Turnpike where numerous accidents and fatalities had occurred.
However, VLTs took a higher priority. Where did these same individuals sought to gain support for them? By visiting a local elementary school. Let me ask you this. How would feel if your state elected official visited the elementary school of your child, and talked to them how VLTs (in simpler terms gambling) will help their education. This is extremely sad, and in one word: tragic.
Tragic in that, they can convince individuals that gambling money is the only way to help Elmont. It is tragic to see, the hard work of Italian, Irish and Polish workers to build the best Racing Track in America, be shortchanged and demoralized into a VLT parlor.
Todays residents of our great community, will suffer tremendously. Let's don't forget that less than 6% of the money spent on VLTs actually go to education. Simply think, of all the potential lives that are risk, the individuals and families who are ruined. I am concerned for the welfare of the children of the community. I am aware of what VLTs had done to that poor baby who died in her mothers car in South Carolina, because she had to go and gamble on VLTs. I am aware of likes of what happen in Kentucky, West Virginia, New Brunswick, Rhode Island, Quebec, Alberta, and others (just naming a few from news reports and studies) where children are affected, unable to get supplies for school, become addicted themselves and are unable to live a normal life cause of what VLTs had done to their families and community. These are the harsh reality, and the deep cutting price and long lasting affect VLTs have.
Let us bring back what Belmont Park was. Bring back the Turf and Field Mansion. Make into a museum, a community center. Have a place to hold concerts, community events and make it friendly, and family oriented place. The community wants an improvement at Belmont. not its destruction. We only hope that the media will not remain one sided by only listening to individuals who live across town, or in farther away communities, but take into account the opinions and sentiments of people that actually live around Belmont Park.
Friday, December 28, 2007
Thursday, December 27, 2007
VLTs Placement Should Be Limited
We Suggest the following restrictions to be implemented in New York State in regard to placement of VLTs
1. VLTs should not be installed within 10 miles of a prior planned or installed facility. No two VLTs should share the same 10 mile radius.
2. VLTs should not be installed within 1500 feet of a school facility. This is not limited to the exact location to the machines, but access to the facility that supports or contain these machines.
1. VLTs should not be installed within 10 miles of a prior planned or installed facility. No two VLTs should share the same 10 mile radius.
2. VLTs should not be installed within 1500 feet of a school facility. This is not limited to the exact location to the machines, but access to the facility that supports or contain these machines.
States and its Lotteries and Gambling
Some interesting facts and statements:
In 2000, New York State kept 38 percent of its lottery revenue for education. That share has dropped to 32 percent, but the dollar amount rose from $1.3 billion in 2000 to $2.2 billion last year.
But Jerry McPeak, a Democratic state representative in Oklahoma, said states that have committed to a percentage should not later lower that number.
“I think if you pass a lottery and tell people that a certain proportion of those dollars are going to something like education, then you ought to keep your word,” Mr. McPeak said.
Source: For Schools, Lottery Payoffs Fall Short of Promises, New York Times. October 17, 2007.
They say the games take particular advantage of the most vulnerable members of society, including the poor and members of minority groups.
“Scratch-off tickets are to the lottery what crack is to cocaine,” said State Senator Eliot Shapleigh, a Democrat who represents El Paso.
Source: The $50 Ticket: A Lottery Boon Raises Concern, The New York Times, December 27, 2007
But make no mistake, gambling is a tax - the worst kind. As Money magazine reported, it is inefficient since most of it goes to prizes and administration. And it mostly taxes the poor because, as the Illinois Lottery billboards in poor neighbourhoods used to say, "This could be your ticket out".
For those of us who buy and don't win, it is a 100% tax. (If all it takes for us to accept a 100% tax rate is to have a chance - ever so slight - to win big, then why not have an Income Tax Roulette game: when we send in our income tax returns, a certain percentage of us win back the amount we would have had to pay.)
Aren't VLTs just the poor man's stock market? Aren't we surrounded by breathless billboards about the next big jackpot, media glorifying the newest millionaires, hospitals organizing casino nights and dream lotteries?
Source: New Brunswick Telegraph Journal April 2001
New York Racing Association Chairman Barry Schwartz said NYRA's two main concerns with the installation of the VLTs are the "continuance of our existing relationship" and the negative impact "we feel the VLTs will have on the 36-day Thoroughbred meet.
Source: Thoroughbred Times. January 29, 2002.
In 2000, New York State kept 38 percent of its lottery revenue for education. That share has dropped to 32 percent, but the dollar amount rose from $1.3 billion in 2000 to $2.2 billion last year.
But Jerry McPeak, a Democratic state representative in Oklahoma, said states that have committed to a percentage should not later lower that number.
“I think if you pass a lottery and tell people that a certain proportion of those dollars are going to something like education, then you ought to keep your word,” Mr. McPeak said.
Source: For Schools, Lottery Payoffs Fall Short of Promises, New York Times. October 17, 2007.
They say the games take particular advantage of the most vulnerable members of society, including the poor and members of minority groups.
“Scratch-off tickets are to the lottery what crack is to cocaine,” said State Senator Eliot Shapleigh, a Democrat who represents El Paso.
Source: The $50 Ticket: A Lottery Boon Raises Concern, The New York Times, December 27, 2007
But make no mistake, gambling is a tax - the worst kind. As Money magazine reported, it is inefficient since most of it goes to prizes and administration. And it mostly taxes the poor because, as the Illinois Lottery billboards in poor neighbourhoods used to say, "This could be your ticket out".
For those of us who buy and don't win, it is a 100% tax. (If all it takes for us to accept a 100% tax rate is to have a chance - ever so slight - to win big, then why not have an Income Tax Roulette game: when we send in our income tax returns, a certain percentage of us win back the amount we would have had to pay.)
Aren't VLTs just the poor man's stock market? Aren't we surrounded by breathless billboards about the next big jackpot, media glorifying the newest millionaires, hospitals organizing casino nights and dream lotteries?
Source: New Brunswick Telegraph Journal April 2001
New York Racing Association Chairman Barry Schwartz said NYRA's two main concerns with the installation of the VLTs are the "continuance of our existing relationship" and the negative impact "we feel the VLTs will have on the 36-day Thoroughbred meet.
Source: Thoroughbred Times. January 29, 2002.
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Preserve Belmont
After reading an article in Thoroughbred Times, where the Preservation
League of New York State placed Saratoga Race Track to its list; we are
concerned and perhaps confused as to why Belmont Park is not on the same
list.
Belmont Park is sharing the potentially same fate as Saratoga, yet it
served a far greater historical contribution to the horse racing
community. The decision to construct the Belmont Race Track was in
reference to the historical racing that occurred on the Hempstead Plains
during the 1600s when Richard Nicolls would sponsored races. Horse racing
had occurred in the surrounding areas of the Belmont Park, close to 100
years prior to Saratoga. Thus, supporting a far richer historical
significance.
Additionally, Belmont Park is the home track of the triple crown; where
the most historical, significant, and memorable races has occurred in
horse racing history.
We hope that members of the Preservation League and others in New York
State, value the accomplishments of Belmont Park, and its contribution to
the history of New York State, and of our great country. We have been
advocating a museum at Belmont Park for some time now. With NYRA
re-mastering its recordings and films, it may serve as a great opportunity
to revitalize Belmont Park historical nature and ensure its legacy lives
on properly.
Friday, December 14, 2007
NYRA: VLTs Not Needed
Reported by CBSSports, NYRA President and CEO Charles Hayward stated that "NYRA can be profitable by the end of 2009... with or without the start-up of Video Lottery Terminals."
With proper oversight, and increase participation with the community, Belmont Park can once again regain its glory with the surrounding residents and families. Let us restore the greatness of horse racing that Belmont Park has shown for over a century, without destroying its essence.
Churchill Downs, has the Kentucky Derby Museum. www.derbymuseum.org
It would serve as a wonderful opportunity for family and children from around our area to explore the rich history Belmont Park has, the Triple Crown Jewel in horse racing. Proceeds from ticket sales and tours could go to improving the facilities and the ambiance of the surrounding areas.
With proper oversight, and increase participation with the community, Belmont Park can once again regain its glory with the surrounding residents and families. Let us restore the greatness of horse racing that Belmont Park has shown for over a century, without destroying its essence.
Churchill Downs, has the Kentucky Derby Museum. www.derbymuseum.org
It would serve as a wonderful opportunity for family and children from around our area to explore the rich history Belmont Park has, the Triple Crown Jewel in horse racing. Proceeds from ticket sales and tours could go to improving the facilities and the ambiance of the surrounding areas.
Monday, December 10, 2007
VLTs in NY Shutting Down
Tioga and Vernon Downs are considering closing down, due to high costs, taxes owed to the State, and tough competition. These racinos are the first to formally announce the possible closure at the end of the year, and as highly speculated Yonkers Racino may follow in suit.
The NY State Senate, passed a measure to reduce these racinos' tax obligation to the state by 10%. In other words, 10% less will be going to help education funding, because the racinos need more money for marketing.
Even though it does make some sense, especially since there is competition with Native American, Pennsylvania, Atlantic City, and other NY State racinos, that marketing might be useful. Though, we should ask ourselves how successful are those NY Lottery TV and radio commercials?
With competition already very high, many in the NY State Senate wish to add even more racinos in New York. Common sense tells us, if competition is heavy and racinos are being forced to close; that adding more racinos is not a suitable solution.
Proponents for VLTs argue that New York earned $273 million dollars from VLTs, from 2006-2007. Which when it gets divided, Elmont UFSD receives a check of about $500,000. Yes, it is better than nothing, but in terms of tax relief its contribution is nil. But what many proponents of VLTs would not mention is, how much money is gambled on VLTs.
In 2006-2007, $6.4 billion dollars were spent on VLTs. With only 4.2% of it, actually going to education. 91.9% goes to credit won, or simpler terms prize winnings. With numbers like these, it is no surprise that racinos are losing money. Again, notice where the NY Senate plans to fix this...not the credit win aspect, but the education funding.
During the same time, the NY State Lottery, received a total of $6.6 billion dollars. This figure just marginally higher than that of the VLTs figure. However, 31.2% and $2 billion dollars actually goes to funding education. There is a huge difference between $273 million and $2 billion.
Distribution of VLT funds in NY is broken. New York is still very young in terms of VLTs, and its implications.
New Brunswick, Canada has had VLTs since 1989, the first province to obtain them. Today, they are downsizing and reducing the numbers and locations of VLTs. An idea, that originally thought would bring in revenue for tax relief, instead brought much grief. Close to 5% of the population became addicted gamblers due to VLTs. 56% of the popular knows someone close to them who is an addicted gambler. The population has grown intensively wary about the moral implications on their society, and the effects of it on their children, who many look at VLTs as entertainment and culture high-life. Today, 70% of the population there oppose having them in their community.
Let us hope that the same mistake will not happen in New York. Let is start in Elmont: where morality and our concerns for our children's future must and should come first.
The NY State Senate, passed a measure to reduce these racinos' tax obligation to the state by 10%. In other words, 10% less will be going to help education funding, because the racinos need more money for marketing.
Even though it does make some sense, especially since there is competition with Native American, Pennsylvania, Atlantic City, and other NY State racinos, that marketing might be useful. Though, we should ask ourselves how successful are those NY Lottery TV and radio commercials?
With competition already very high, many in the NY State Senate wish to add even more racinos in New York. Common sense tells us, if competition is heavy and racinos are being forced to close; that adding more racinos is not a suitable solution.
Proponents for VLTs argue that New York earned $273 million dollars from VLTs, from 2006-2007. Which when it gets divided, Elmont UFSD receives a check of about $500,000. Yes, it is better than nothing, but in terms of tax relief its contribution is nil. But what many proponents of VLTs would not mention is, how much money is gambled on VLTs.
In 2006-2007, $6.4 billion dollars were spent on VLTs. With only 4.2% of it, actually going to education. 91.9% goes to credit won, or simpler terms prize winnings. With numbers like these, it is no surprise that racinos are losing money. Again, notice where the NY Senate plans to fix this...not the credit win aspect, but the education funding.
During the same time, the NY State Lottery, received a total of $6.6 billion dollars. This figure just marginally higher than that of the VLTs figure. However, 31.2% and $2 billion dollars actually goes to funding education. There is a huge difference between $273 million and $2 billion.
Distribution of VLT funds in NY is broken. New York is still very young in terms of VLTs, and its implications.New Brunswick, Canada has had VLTs since 1989, the first province to obtain them. Today, they are downsizing and reducing the numbers and locations of VLTs. An idea, that originally thought would bring in revenue for tax relief, instead brought much grief. Close to 5% of the population became addicted gamblers due to VLTs. 56% of the popular knows someone close to them who is an addicted gambler. The population has grown intensively wary about the moral implications on their society, and the effects of it on their children, who many look at VLTs as entertainment and culture high-life. Today, 70% of the population there oppose having them in their community.
Let us hope that the same mistake will not happen in New York. Let is start in Elmont: where morality and our concerns for our children's future must and should come first.
Sunday, December 2, 2007
Why Say No to VLTs?
There are numerous reasons why we oppose VLTs. Below are just some of the reasons.
1. VLTs provide the most addicting version of gambling. It is highly visual, quick and easy in that it requires no skills. VLTs display the greatest rate of gambling addicts. When gambling appears in a community, it brings a wave of addiction. In a mature gambling market, compulsive gambling typically seizes the lives of 1.5% to 2.5% of the adult population. That amounts to three to five times the number of people suffering from cancer. The New York Times published that brining VLTs is like going on the Wrong Track. And I quote, "The state should not be expanding gambling at its racetracks - the euphemistically named slot machines that are a gambler's version of crack cocaine."
2. VLTs will bring social and economic costs. Studies show that costs include bankruptcy, tax fraud, loan and credit card fraud, embezzlement, assault, theft, child and spousal abuse, investigatory, judiciary and penal costs, overloading of infrastructure, payment default, loss of business and several others. Gambling costs more than raising taxes. Each compulsive gambler costs the economy between $14,006 and $22,077 per year. Various studies have placed the costs from equal to revenues to five times revenues. We find the issue of traffic, crime, and intrusion into the quality of life of a single family residential area to be troublesome.
3. Most at risk are those who live close. Studies show that eighty percent of VLT gamblers reside within 10 miles of the casino. That mean that parents, seniors, veterans, and workers of the surrounding communities need to spend their free time and money at the Casino in order for it to survive. Therefore, it is the citizens of the surrounding location who are most at risk in facing the social and economic hardships from VLTs.
4. VLTs will not help our children. Dr. Zabilka a former proponent to VLTs in Kentucky states the follow reflection: "... (Ten) years ago I had my first experience of seeing children in my classroom suffering from hunger because there was no money at home for food, because it had all been spent on the lottery. That experience was so strong that it changed me from an indifferent occasional bettor and participant in office pools and sweepstakes, to a passionate opponent of gambling in all its forms." We do not want the children of our community to suffer. "I believe that our state legislators should be responsible and find another way to fund our schools. We can't destroy neighborhoods and people's lives and that's the piece people just don't get." - educator and Baltimore, MD City Council President, Sheila Dixon. We are in total agreement.
5. Funds from VLTs are unpredictably and unreliable. The funds are handled similarly as the Lottery, where revenue isn't going directly to education as originally intended nor stated. Many consider the lottery system as a failure as the VLT system following in suit. A figure of $20 million dollars, similar in nature as the one given to Yonkers was presented. However, what was misleading was that the $20 million dollars are going to fund the education of Elmont's children. Instead it is divided.
Divided in funding police. Funding for beautification project. Then the rest divided among three school districts.
What amount will be left for Elmont? How much of it will actually benefit the children of Elmont?
We will find Elmont with a extra funding of maybe $4.6 million combined for our two school districts. For some it may seem a lot. However, when you look at it in terms of the big picture; elementary and high school budgets at over 60 and 140 million respectfully. We are getting no more than a 2% increase from the state. To note, this figure does not include any additional expenses, and with school budgets rising after each year, its financial contribution will be even more minimal.
This is something that our state representatives should be working to get for the children of Elmont, without the need of installing VLTs, and its potential to damage families, children's' future, value of our homes and quality of our life. Just like the plan given to Yonkers and Saratoga, the funding is always dependent on its placement in the New York State budget. The funds come from the general fund, and therefore we technically do not have a guarantee, if we'll consistently get that amount (agreement is for up to $20 million), or any amount five years from now.
6. VLTs in New York has not lived up to expectations. State representatives originally expected machines to have a $400-$500 per day revenue. Yonkers Raceway fell dramatically with its current $192 per day revenue. Even resort community Saratoga Springs, only reached $258 per day revenue per machine. Based on a June 2007, NY Times article, Casino operators at Yonkers want the State to help them, because they are losing $12 million a year and sought for Senator Larkin to propose a bill to help racinos, by reducing their obligation to education by 20%.
7. There are currently too many racinos in New York State. The idea of having multiple near by racinos to the NY Metro area is troublesome. Aqueduct is currently less than 8 miles away from Belmont. Multiple competitive racinos may actually hurt funding.
8. VLTs will change the image of Belmont Park negatively. We believe it is important it is that we maintain the integrity and character that has madeBelmont
9. VLTs are morally wrong. "Avoid gaming. This is a vice which is productive of every possible evil., equally injurious to the morals and health of its votaries. It is the child of Avarice, the brother inequity, the father of Mischief. It has been the ruin of many worthy families: the loss of many a man's honor and the cause of Suicide." - George Washington, 1783.
The following organizations are opposed to gambling and / or VLTs:
Frank Padavan - State Senator - Vice President Pro Tempore - Republican 11th District Queens
Sheldon Silver - State Assemblyman - Assembly Speaker - Democrat - 64th Assembly District - Manhattan
Sam Hoyt - State Assemblyman - Democrat - 144th Assembly District - Buffalo
William Parment - State Assemblyman - Democrat - 150th Assembly District - Jamestown
10. VLTs have created unnecessary casualties. We do not want what happened in South Carolina to happen here. South Carolina eliminated VLTs after a baby died as her mom gambled on VLTs. We must face the harsh reality and consequences of VLTs.
11. Youths are most at risk. October 2007 New York State report stated that 1 in 5 youths are hooked on gambling. This is largely due to on-line and electronic type gambling, that are identical to VLTs. Promoting VLTs at an elementary school only helps to promote this troublesome issue. Representatives in Albany should be working to help prevent gambling, and especially protect our children.
We agree in a plan for beautification. We agree with a plan to improve upon the restaurants (3-4) already inside Belmont Park and perhaps add another. We agree to install stores and shops. We also would be in favor of a convention center / hotel inside Belmont Park, similar in nature to the historic club house demolished in 1960. Something that will highlight and showcase the historic nature of the grounds. There is no need for VLTs nor their consequences.
We as residents of Elmont, and the surrounding communities must not be fooled by the false hopes of politicians seeking reelection. We must examine all the facts, look both sides of every issue. Why are some communities so adamantly against VLTs and casinos? What makes individuals think that Elmont is different and thus is a positive thing? Is it because the people from Elmont are different from other communities? Yes, we want change. We want positive change; and yes, the locals want respect.
1. VLTs provide the most addicting version of gambling. It is highly visual, quick and easy in that it requires no skills. VLTs display the greatest rate of gambling addicts. When gambling appears in a community, it brings a wave of addiction. In a mature gambling market, compulsive gambling typically seizes the lives of 1.5% to 2.5% of the adult population. That amounts to three to five times the number of people suffering from cancer. The New York Times published that brining VLTs is like going on the Wrong Track. And I quote, "The state should not be expanding gambling at its racetracks - the euphemistically named slot machines that are a gambler's version of crack cocaine."
2. VLTs will bring social and economic costs. Studies show that costs include bankruptcy, tax fraud, loan and credit card fraud, embezzlement, assault, theft, child and spousal abuse, investigatory, judiciary and penal costs, overloading of infrastructure, payment default, loss of business and several others. Gambling costs more than raising taxes. Each compulsive gambler costs the economy between $14,006 and $22,077 per year. Various studies have placed the costs from equal to revenues to five times revenues. We find the issue of traffic, crime, and intrusion into the quality of life of a single family residential area to be troublesome.
3. Most at risk are those who live close. Studies show that eighty percent of VLT gamblers reside within 10 miles of the casino. That mean that parents, seniors, veterans, and workers of the surrounding communities need to spend their free time and money at the Casino in order for it to survive. Therefore, it is the citizens of the surrounding location who are most at risk in facing the social and economic hardships from VLTs.
4. VLTs will not help our children. Dr. Zabilka a former proponent to VLTs in Kentucky states the follow reflection: "... (Ten) years ago I had my first experience of seeing children in my classroom suffering from hunger because there was no money at home for food, because it had all been spent on the lottery. That experience was so strong that it changed me from an indifferent occasional bettor and participant in office pools and sweepstakes, to a passionate opponent of gambling in all its forms." We do not want the children of our community to suffer. "I believe that our state legislators should be responsible and find another way to fund our schools. We can't destroy neighborhoods and people's lives and that's the piece people just don't get." - educator and Baltimore, MD City Council President, Sheila Dixon. We are in total agreement.
5. Funds from VLTs are unpredictably and unreliable. The funds are handled similarly as the Lottery, where revenue isn't going directly to education as originally intended nor stated. Many consider the lottery system as a failure as the VLT system following in suit. A figure of $20 million dollars, similar in nature as the one given to Yonkers was presented. However, what was misleading was that the $20 million dollars are going to fund the education of Elmont's children. Instead it is divided.
Divided in funding police. Funding for beautification project. Then the rest divided among three school districts.
What amount will be left for Elmont? How much of it will actually benefit the children of Elmont?
We will find Elmont with a extra funding of maybe $4.6 million combined for our two school districts. For some it may seem a lot. However, when you look at it in terms of the big picture; elementary and high school budgets at over 60 and 140 million respectfully. We are getting no more than a 2% increase from the state. To note, this figure does not include any additional expenses, and with school budgets rising after each year, its financial contribution will be even more minimal.
This is something that our state representatives should be working to get for the children of Elmont, without the need of installing VLTs, and its potential to damage families, children's' future, value of our homes and quality of our life. Just like the plan given to Yonkers and Saratoga, the funding is always dependent on its placement in the New York State budget. The funds come from the general fund, and therefore we technically do not have a guarantee, if we'll consistently get that amount (agreement is for up to $20 million), or any amount five years from now.
6. VLTs in New York has not lived up to expectations. State representatives originally expected machines to have a $400-$500 per day revenue. Yonkers Raceway fell dramatically with its current $192 per day revenue. Even resort community Saratoga Springs, only reached $258 per day revenue per machine. Based on a June 2007, NY Times article, Casino operators at Yonkers want the State to help them, because they are losing $12 million a year and sought for Senator Larkin to propose a bill to help racinos, by reducing their obligation to education by 20%.
7. There are currently too many racinos in New York State. The idea of having multiple near by racinos to the NY Metro area is troublesome. Aqueduct is currently less than 8 miles away from Belmont. Multiple competitive racinos may actually hurt funding.
8. VLTs will change the image of Belmont Park negatively. We believe it is important it is that we maintain the integrity and character that has made
9. VLTs are morally wrong. "Avoid gaming. This is a vice which is productive of every possible evil., equally injurious to the morals and health of its votaries. It is the child of Avarice, the brother inequity, the father of Mischief. It has been the ruin of many worthy families: the loss of many a man's honor and the cause of Suicide." - George Washington, 1783.
The following organizations are opposed to gambling and / or VLTs:
National:
Citizens Equal Rights Alliance
Community Forum
Concerned Women for America
Focus on the Family
National Coalition Against Legalized Gambling
United Property Owners
Reservation Report
United Methodist Church
USPACT
New York:
Casinos-Free Sullivan County
Citizens Against Casino Gambling in Erie County
Citizens for a Better Buffalo
Don't Gamble Our Future
Oneida Land Claims Victim
New Yorkers Family Research Foundation, Inc.
No Casino 1000 Islands
No Casinos Erie County
NoSaugertiesCasino
Save the East End
Shawangunk Ridge Coalition
Stop the Casino in Hampton Bays
Upstate Citizens for Equality
Western New York Coalition for Progress
Coalition Against Gambling of New York
Conservative Party of New York State
Frank Padavan - State Senator - Vice President Pro Tempore - Republican 11th District Queens
Sheldon Silver - State Assemblyman - Assembly Speaker - Democrat - 64th Assembly District - Manhattan
Sam Hoyt - State Assemblyman - Democrat - 144th Assembly District - Buffalo
William Parment - State Assemblyman - Democrat - 150th Assembly District - Jamestown
10. VLTs have created unnecessary casualties. We do not want what happened in South Carolina to happen here. South Carolina eliminated VLTs after a baby died as her mom gambled on VLTs. We must face the harsh reality and consequences of VLTs.
11. Youths are most at risk. October 2007 New York State report stated that 1 in 5 youths are hooked on gambling. This is largely due to on-line and electronic type gambling, that are identical to VLTs. Promoting VLTs at an elementary school only helps to promote this troublesome issue. Representatives in Albany should be working to help prevent gambling, and especially protect our children.
We agree in a plan for beautification. We agree with a plan to improve upon the restaurants (3-4) already inside Belmont Park and perhaps add another. We agree to install stores and shops. We also would be in favor of a convention center / hotel inside Belmont Park, similar in nature to the historic club house demolished in 1960. Something that will highlight and showcase the historic nature of the grounds. There is no need for VLTs nor their consequences.
We as residents of Elmont, and the surrounding communities must not be fooled by the false hopes of politicians seeking reelection. We must examine all the facts, look both sides of every issue. Why are some communities so adamantly against VLTs and casinos? What makes individuals think that Elmont is different and thus is a positive thing? Is it because the people from Elmont are different from other communities? Yes, we want change. We want positive change; and yes, the locals want respect.
Friday, November 30, 2007
NYRA Extension Seems to be Confirmed
According to a source familiar with closed-door negotiations between Governor Spitzer's office and the state Senate and Assembly, a deal is firming up that will extend the franchise NYRA has held since 1955 for another 30 years, as the governor has strongly advocated.
A move we believe may be the best thing for Elmont with the appropriate oversight. Our State Senator Craig Johnson has been named to the Senate Racing, Gaming and Wagering Committee and we hope he will fight to protect what the surrounding residents of the Belmont Park want.
A move we believe may be the best thing for Elmont with the appropriate oversight. Our State Senator Craig Johnson has been named to the Senate Racing, Gaming and Wagering Committee and we hope he will fight to protect what the surrounding residents of the Belmont Park want.
Johnson said that past events have shown the need for any final franchise agreement to include specific language that spells out what the track's relationship with the communities will be, and how residents will be able to benefit. He continued, "I hope that this appointment will bring these communities one step closer toward having an iron-clad agreement with the track that is backed by the full force of the law."
We are glad that some representatives in Elmont feel the same concern as we have. Assembly Speaker Shelly Silver has been adamant all along that there be no VLTs at Belmont, and that appears to prevail. While details remain fuzzy, that NYRA is all but assured the uninterrupted franchise should come as a great relief to the state's billion-dollar thoroughbred industry.Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Civic Works to Stop Installation of More Antennas
After being notified via Public Notice this past weekend, the civic has been working diligently with Town Councilman Edward Ambrosino to stop the installation of additional cellular phone antennas between the corners of Locustwood Boulevard and Sussex Road on Hempstead Turnpike, where the Elmont Health Center currently exists. The plans were to be introduced at the Wednesday, November 14 at the Town Zoning Hearing. However, the cellular phone company retracted its plans with no future hearing date planned. More details will be available at our next civic meeting on the 15th.
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Water Tank: UPDATE
After conferring with the Water Authority of Western Nassau County the Water Tank on Hempstead Turnpike was finally getting cleaned.
Their response:
Their response:
This 5 million gallonWe would like to thank everyone who contributed to the resolution to this issue.
storage unit is the largest of our seven water tanks. It was last
repaired and painted in 2000 and used a Urethane exterior paint coating.
Given the fact that we have active wells at this location we are extremely
limited by Department of Health regulations as to the cleaning product and
process allowed to clean this tank. We have once before cleaned this
surface after its last overhaul in 2000. Given the size and open location
of the unit it is highly susceptible to accumulate this build up making it
unsightly.
It is our hope, weather permitting, that we can finish cleaning this tank
within two - three weeks time. Unfortunately we cannot guarantee that the
dirt and mold will not begin to show up again in the not too distant
future. By using our own employees in this cleaning process, as opposed
to outside contractors, we are saving a significant amount of money while
at the same time carefully addressing the exterior finish so as not to
damage the paint layer costing hundreds of thousands of dollars to
repaint. We appreciate your patience during this time and hope to make
this tank look like new.
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Communities: VLTs failed us.
Recently, Skelos and Alfano formally expressed their support for VLTs at Belmont Park and provided this as their reason as printed in the Three Village Times:
"$20 million in state aid payments that would be apportioned between the (1) affected school districts, including the Elmont Union Free School District, Floral Park-Bellerose Union Free School District and Sewanhaka Central High School District, (2) the Nassau County Police Department's Fifth Precinct and (3) a newly created "Belmont Park Community Reinvestment Trust."
Everything sounds wonderful, but is it really?
The misconception is that the Elmont Union Free School District will get a guaranteed $20 million per year via VLTs. The money is no way guaranteed, nor is the total amount going to Elmont schools. So after dividing the $20 million into 3 school districts, then giving a portion to Nassau County for funding the extra need of Police, and then maybe with funds left over create a Reinvestment Trust; how much of it is actually going to fund education?
Then comes the issues. How will VLTs compete with VLTs at Aqueduct, less then 8 miles away? Then what will happen if the funds come short?
These same state representatives expect machines to have a $400-$500 per day revenue. What will expect Belmont to have greater results than Yonkers Raceway that expectations fell dramatically with its current $192 per day revenue. Based on a NY times article, Casino operators at Yonkers want the State to help them, because they are losing $12 million a year. The plan for VLTs to help and improve Yonkers have failed. In June of this year, Senator Larkin proposed a bill to help the racinos, by reducing their obligation to education by 20%. Then the question comes, how would Elmont be different? Economically, how would more racino competition help generate more funds for education?
Of course, many would argue that Saratoga is a symbol of success of VLTs. Saratoga has two racetracks, one operated by NYRA, and the other being the racino. Even there, VLTs failed to reach its hype, at $258 per day revnue per machine. The city of Saratoga received a deal of getting $3.6 million a year for improvements. This perhaps similar to the plan being designed for Elmont. But what is conveniently being omitted is that this money is not guaranteed and it is dependent on its placement on the New York State budget. That means the legislature, or the governor can cut it at any time, and most importantly if there is a state budget in place.
The New York Times published that brining VLTs is like going on the Wrong Track. And I quote, "The state should not be expanding gambling at its racetracks - the euphemistically named slot machines that are a gambler's version of crack cocaine."
It is a tragedy that these State Representatives held a press conference in an elementary school in front of children to endorse in essence gambling in the community of Elmont. Studies show that eighty percent of VLT gamblers reside with 10 miles of the casino. That mean that parents, seniors, veterans, and workers of the surrounding communities need to spend their free time and money at the Casino in order for it to survive. That in essence is what these representatives believe will help Elmont.
I hope that the children of Elmont, their families, and my fellow community members do not get misguided by the notion that gambling is the solution to better education and lower taxes. State and federal studies has shown that VLTs are only a short term infusion of money, where the financial consequences after five years outweigh the short term benefit it had attained in some studies at a 5:1 ratio.
VLTs are not the solution for the future of Elmont.
"$20 million in state aid payments that would be apportioned between the (1) affected school districts, including the Elmont Union Free School District, Floral Park-Bellerose Union Free School District and Sewanhaka Central High School District, (2) the Nassau County Police Department's Fifth Precinct and (3) a newly created "Belmont Park Community Reinvestment Trust."
Everything sounds wonderful, but is it really?
The misconception is that the Elmont Union Free School District will get a guaranteed $20 million per year via VLTs. The money is no way guaranteed, nor is the total amount going to Elmont schools. So after dividing the $20 million into 3 school districts, then giving a portion to Nassau County for funding the extra need of Police, and then maybe with funds left over create a Reinvestment Trust; how much of it is actually going to fund education?
Then comes the issues. How will VLTs compete with VLTs at Aqueduct, less then 8 miles away? Then what will happen if the funds come short?
These same state representatives expect machines to have a $400-$500 per day revenue. What will expect Belmont to have greater results than Yonkers Raceway that expectations fell dramatically with its current $192 per day revenue. Based on a NY times article, Casino operators at Yonkers want the State to help them, because they are losing $12 million a year. The plan for VLTs to help and improve Yonkers have failed. In June of this year, Senator Larkin proposed a bill to help the racinos, by reducing their obligation to education by 20%. Then the question comes, how would Elmont be different? Economically, how would more racino competition help generate more funds for education?
Of course, many would argue that Saratoga is a symbol of success of VLTs. Saratoga has two racetracks, one operated by NYRA, and the other being the racino. Even there, VLTs failed to reach its hype, at $258 per day revnue per machine. The city of Saratoga received a deal of getting $3.6 million a year for improvements. This perhaps similar to the plan being designed for Elmont. But what is conveniently being omitted is that this money is not guaranteed and it is dependent on its placement on the New York State budget. That means the legislature, or the governor can cut it at any time, and most importantly if there is a state budget in place.
The New York Times published that brining VLTs is like going on the Wrong Track. And I quote, "The state should not be expanding gambling at its racetracks - the euphemistically named slot machines that are a gambler's version of crack cocaine."
It is a tragedy that these State Representatives held a press conference in an elementary school in front of children to endorse in essence gambling in the community of Elmont. Studies show that eighty percent of VLT gamblers reside with 10 miles of the casino. That mean that parents, seniors, veterans, and workers of the surrounding communities need to spend their free time and money at the Casino in order for it to survive. That in essence is what these representatives believe will help Elmont.
I hope that the children of Elmont, their families, and my fellow community members do not get misguided by the notion that gambling is the solution to better education and lower taxes. State and federal studies has shown that VLTs are only a short term infusion of money, where the financial consequences after five years outweigh the short term benefit it had attained in some studies at a 5:1 ratio.
VLTs are not the solution for the future of Elmont.
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
October 18 Meeting Review
Our October 18th meeting was a very informative and productive meeting and we thank all the members in attendance. Additionally, we welcome all our new and returning members.
Mrs. Jakab, announced as tradition, the October meeting serves as an opportunity for election candidates to come and have their voices heard. Our doors are open, and the only thing requested was for them to contact the civic announcing if they were planning to attend. Mrs. Jakab noted that only one individual called, and that was Ali Mirza, who despite having a fundraiser in his honor at the same time, will nevertheless spend time to communicate with our members.
Mr. Barker discussed the possibility of Belmont as a potential place for new businesses to take place, and made people aware that they are individuals who are interested in adding revenue such as VLTs casino, hotel and outlets. The community has had a lot of meetings, in that individuals were able to express their concerns and voice their opinions with this important matter.
In regard to future development of a Supermarket, Mr. Barker made the membership aware that there is a plan to have one along Hempstead Turnpike, and the talks is to have it at the old Argo Theatre. Mr. Barker suggested to have the supermarket be constructed in the current Home Depot shopping center. Mr. Barker opened the floor for additional suggestions.
Mrs. Singh asked why did the Wauldbaums supermarket leave in the first place. The response was that, the answer isn't clear, but it had to do with not enough profit and the termination or discontinuation of the lease. Also noted was that Home Depot did also expand.
Mr. Piil noted that the welding place on Hempstead Turnpike was knocked down, and the rumor is to have Supermarket at its location. Noted was that the property isn't large, and it lacks sufficient place for parking. He agreed that adding the supermarket by Home Depot would be better.
Mr. Smith noted, that the idea of adding a supermarket at the Home Depot Shopping Center is a good idea however there is the issue of the buses. He is concerned about the health and environmental damages that the buses cause to the surrounding properties and the health of individuals around. He believed that Elmont should not be subsidizing a corporate bus company, and feel that the other communities of the high school district is taking advantage of us.
Mr. Piil noted that with NYRA, the Belmont Park has become a dinosaur who gives more importance to housing horses than caring about people. Senior housing could be an alternative plan.
Mr. Mirza presented himself as the Democrat and Working Family candidate for the Nassau County Legislature, Third District, and is a father, single parent of a daughter attending Northwestern University. He became more involved with government, in regard to the continuous increase of taxes, and made people aware that we are paying more taxes than in Garden City. He mentioned that he helped to bring in Sustainable Long Island to Elmont, to help revitalize the area and to help bring in new ideas and advancements for business. To decrease taxes, Mr. Mirza believes that we need to increase the county tax base, without increase the burden on residents by revitalizing business in return will bring in more taxes and increase in sales tax. He hopes to have more people come into Nassau County to shop.
Committee Reports:
School District, nothing to be reported. Many of the members stop attending the meetings due to their displeasure of the atmosphere of the meetings and the tension portrayed.
Sustainable Long Island, Mr. Nicolosi reported that Walmart and other corporations are meeting with local officials, including our school superintendents, in regard to their interest in building in Elmont. Also mentioned was the report that Albany is looking into changing the way schools are funded by the state,
Civic Coalition Council, Mr. Nicolosi reported that a letter was sent to Town Supervisor Kate Murray, and State Senator Dean Skelos, individuals who represent us, to ask them to show up at a community meeting.
Mrs. Davidson, noted that Elmont is at a critical point. Our streets are dirty, many of our children are out of control, and large number of cars parked on the streets, even with properties having empty driveways.
Mrs. Jakab, mentioned that another issue, and perhaps the root to the problem with our streets filled with cars, is the issue of illegal apartments. There needs to be greater enforcement in preventing the use of basement apartments that are illegal, and a safety hazard.
In regard to parking, Mr. Rodriguez noted that in our area there is currently no parking between 10am to 4pm. He felt that enforcement of current codes should take priority over adding something like no over night parking. A return to the parking sticker, and enforcement of it is necessary. Once progress is met, then we can advance in regard to over night parking. The membership agrees that this is an appropriate step to take in the manner.
Mr. Rodriguez made the motion, that in regard to various complaints in regard to garbage, and businesses not cleaning, it perhaps be of interest to invite a representative from Sanitation Six to attend the meeting. The motion was moved by Mrs. Davidson, and seconded by Mrs. Jakab, and approved unanimously.
There was concerns about our next meeting being close to Thanksgiving, however the civic will still hold its next meeting on November 15th.
Friday, October 5, 2007
Belmont Park Future
There are needs for major changes and or added contributions from Belmont Park to Elmont. Improved elements that would include the beautification of the area and greater revenue to compensate in particular our school taxes.
Belmont Park has a rich history since it opened in 1905. It is known as the championship track, where all eleven of the triple crown winners claimed their victory. Aside from horse racing, its history includes the 1910 International Aviation Tournament. Some 150,000 people were drawn to the track on Oct. 30, 1910 at the climax of the a Wright Brothers-staged international aerial tournament. The event came to be during a period (1910, 1911 and 1912) in which racing was outlawed in New York State.
Outsiders call Belmont, one of the most beautiful tracks in the world with its landscaping, and its park behind the grandstand. Since 1955, Belmont Park and its sister tracks (Saratoga, Aqueduct and the defunct Jamaica) are operated by NYRA, formerly known as the Greater New York Association.
Elmont is the gateway and the entrance to Long Island. The Belmont Park borders, Hempstead Turnpike (State Route 24), a main artery and it needs to be beautiful. There is no clear visible difference between Queens County (NYC) and Nassau County (Long Island). There is a need for a more welcoming entrance. A suggestion is a decorated triangle with a statue of a famous Belmont Winner, whether it is Secretariat, or Affirmed the last horse to hold the honor of a Triple Crown winner. Ruffian is also a good choice for her her incredible love of running and unwillingness to lose. Whatever gets done needs to be something that is welcoming, and clearly displays that Elmont is a beautiful place to live. Other improvement projects should include the sidewalks that need to be cleaner, and enlarged. Bus stops along the park's southern border needs to be maintained and modernized to help the commuting residents in the area. Lastly, the boundaries of the Belmont Park needs be improved. Assistance to nearby businesses in terms of expansion of the track's necessities, bringing in more customers, more community involvement and communication and most importantly supporting an appropriate market for the residential neighborhood that surrounds it.
Inside the race track has a lot of potential. One idea would be to add a children’s museum for all children to learn about horses, the history of horse racing, the history of Belmont Park, and about Elmont, because it is an historical landmark. A small community/convention center can also be added to enhance the cultural element. Elmont is a residential and family community and the musuem will be a benefit for all children, including the over 8,000 in Elmont elementary and high schools, and in addition, the nearby Floral Park-Bellrose schools that shares it borders with the race track, such as the High School to the east, and the elementary school to the north, separated only by a fence.
Though the idea of adding a museum and a community / convention center may not add as much revenue such as from casino like Video Lottery Terminals or perhaps even a hotel, but such propositions are not viable solutions to our residential neighborhood nor the family atmosphere that Belmont Park tries to portray. Those options will serve as a disservice to the community and tarnish the image of Elmont and Belmont Park. Video lottery terminals serve only as a quick money fix, and are not a solution to helping horse racing or improving the elements of the track. Horse racing does not occur year long, and a hotel will be for a large portion of the year be unused.
If Video Lottery Terminals (VLTs) are added, What will prevent the state to permit additional slot machines in the future to other near by locations? If they allow them in one place, what will prevent them from adding them in a restaurant, your local deli, or your neighbor? Aqueduct is a better choice because for VLTs because they serve as a way to ensure the location survives. With current plans, Belmont Park will be receiving 10 to 15 million dollars a year for capital projects from Aqueduct's VLTs. As of right now, it is illegal to have VLTs at Belmont Park due to New York State Law.
Elmont dissatisfaction in the Belmont Park is party due to NYRA's lack of contribution and communication to the Elmont community. Reports state that there are years in that taxes aren't being paid. Additionally, any money that is made from Belmont, Elmont never really sees cause it goes to a general fund at the County. (approx 10.6 million a year). Just recently the County invested $40,000 and the money matched by the Town of Hempstead to create studies, visioning and plans for improving the area outside the park. Just now, after so many years are the rusting fences being painted and potential plans to improve the eye sore stables that Elmont residents see as they pass by. With a new contract, Elmont has the opportunity to ensure that revenues get assigned to generate projects, community services and capital improvement projects.
There are other alternatives such as a shopping center or a small outlet center with recognizable names to generate revenue and taxes for Elmont. These alternatives help to enhance the racing element of the track, as they serve as a way for patrons to spend the day at a wonderful facility. Families can then enjoy the race track, visit the museum, shop and eat at good restaurants and spend the day at a beautiful and historic park. We are searching for beautification, and restoring Belmont to its former glory, and not just making money. Hard work and desire for enhancement and being the best represents what Elmont and Long Island is about.
Elmont appreciates culture, as evident by the wonderful library we have. A museum would extend that notion, and become a welcoming site for everyone to enjoy, learn and appreciate what Elmont is about. A community / convention center could help unite Elmont even more, and its neighboring communities. That, is Elmont Today.
The Locustwood / Gotham Civic Association, has a special relationship with Belmont Park. It is the civic that is directly affected by changes to the Belmont Park, because the civic area covers the entire southern length of the park, and its address is technically in the civic area. Many of our members live just half a block away from the race track, are concerned about the quality of life changes that might occur. Members in the area know the implications of changes and events at the Belmont Park, from witnessing patrons parking in front of our homes and the effects of patrons and workers from the park interaction with the vicinity. We all want to ensure that any changes are positive and benefit our community both with tax compensation and beautification.
Belmont Park has a rich history since it opened in 1905. It is known as the championship track, where all eleven of the triple crown winners claimed their victory. Aside from horse racing, its history includes the 1910 International Aviation Tournament. Some 150,000 people were drawn to the track on Oct. 30, 1910 at the climax of the a Wright Brothers-staged international aerial tournament. The event came to be during a period (1910, 1911 and 1912) in which racing was outlawed in New York State.
Outsiders call Belmont, one of the most beautiful tracks in the world with its landscaping, and its park behind the grandstand. Since 1955, Belmont Park and its sister tracks (Saratoga, Aqueduct and the defunct Jamaica) are operated by NYRA, formerly known as the Greater New York Association.
Elmont is the gateway and the entrance to Long Island. The Belmont Park borders, Hempstead Turnpike (State Route 24), a main artery and it needs to be beautiful. There is no clear visible difference between Queens County (NYC) and Nassau County (Long Island). There is a need for a more welcoming entrance. A suggestion is a decorated triangle with a statue of a famous Belmont Winner, whether it is Secretariat, or Affirmed the last horse to hold the honor of a Triple Crown winner. Ruffian is also a good choice for her her incredible love of running and unwillingness to lose. Whatever gets done needs to be something that is welcoming, and clearly displays that Elmont is a beautiful place to live. Other improvement projects should include the sidewalks that need to be cleaner, and enlarged. Bus stops along the park's southern border needs to be maintained and modernized to help the commuting residents in the area. Lastly, the boundaries of the Belmont Park needs be improved. Assistance to nearby businesses in terms of expansion of the track's necessities, bringing in more customers, more community involvement and communication and most importantly supporting an appropriate market for the residential neighborhood that surrounds it.
Inside the race track has a lot of potential. One idea would be to add a children’s museum for all children to learn about horses, the history of horse racing, the history of Belmont Park, and about Elmont, because it is an historical landmark. A small community/convention center can also be added to enhance the cultural element. Elmont is a residential and family community and the musuem will be a benefit for all children, including the over 8,000 in Elmont elementary and high schools, and in addition, the nearby Floral Park-Bellrose schools that shares it borders with the race track, such as the High School to the east, and the elementary school to the north, separated only by a fence.
Though the idea of adding a museum and a community / convention center may not add as much revenue such as from casino like Video Lottery Terminals or perhaps even a hotel, but such propositions are not viable solutions to our residential neighborhood nor the family atmosphere that Belmont Park tries to portray. Those options will serve as a disservice to the community and tarnish the image of Elmont and Belmont Park. Video lottery terminals serve only as a quick money fix, and are not a solution to helping horse racing or improving the elements of the track. Horse racing does not occur year long, and a hotel will be for a large portion of the year be unused.
If Video Lottery Terminals (VLTs) are added, What will prevent the state to permit additional slot machines in the future to other near by locations? If they allow them in one place, what will prevent them from adding them in a restaurant, your local deli, or your neighbor? Aqueduct is a better choice because for VLTs because they serve as a way to ensure the location survives. With current plans, Belmont Park will be receiving 10 to 15 million dollars a year for capital projects from Aqueduct's VLTs. As of right now, it is illegal to have VLTs at Belmont Park due to New York State Law.
Elmont dissatisfaction in the Belmont Park is party due to NYRA's lack of contribution and communication to the Elmont community. Reports state that there are years in that taxes aren't being paid. Additionally, any money that is made from Belmont, Elmont never really sees cause it goes to a general fund at the County. (approx 10.6 million a year). Just recently the County invested $40,000 and the money matched by the Town of Hempstead to create studies, visioning and plans for improving the area outside the park. Just now, after so many years are the rusting fences being painted and potential plans to improve the eye sore stables that Elmont residents see as they pass by. With a new contract, Elmont has the opportunity to ensure that revenues get assigned to generate projects, community services and capital improvement projects.
There are other alternatives such as a shopping center or a small outlet center with recognizable names to generate revenue and taxes for Elmont. These alternatives help to enhance the racing element of the track, as they serve as a way for patrons to spend the day at a wonderful facility. Families can then enjoy the race track, visit the museum, shop and eat at good restaurants and spend the day at a beautiful and historic park. We are searching for beautification, and restoring Belmont to its former glory, and not just making money. Hard work and desire for enhancement and being the best represents what Elmont and Long Island is about.
Elmont appreciates culture, as evident by the wonderful library we have. A museum would extend that notion, and become a welcoming site for everyone to enjoy, learn and appreciate what Elmont is about. A community / convention center could help unite Elmont even more, and its neighboring communities. That, is Elmont Today.
The Locustwood / Gotham Civic Association, has a special relationship with Belmont Park. It is the civic that is directly affected by changes to the Belmont Park, because the civic area covers the entire southern length of the park, and its address is technically in the civic area. Many of our members live just half a block away from the race track, are concerned about the quality of life changes that might occur. Members in the area know the implications of changes and events at the Belmont Park, from witnessing patrons parking in front of our homes and the effects of patrons and workers from the park interaction with the vicinity. We all want to ensure that any changes are positive and benefit our community both with tax compensation and beautification.
Sunday, September 16, 2007
Joint Statement on the Futue of Belmont Park
JOINT STATEMENT FROM SENATOR CRAIG M. JOHNSON AND ASSEMBLYMAN TOM ALFANO ON THE FUTURE OF BELMONT PARK RACE TRACK AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE COMMUNITY
As representatives of the communities surrounding the Belmont Park Race Track, we remain very concerned with what appeared to have been a lack of consideration for Elmont and Floral Park in the awarding of a new state franchise for the thoroughbred franchise.
Recent events, however, have given us optimism that the communities’ voices will not be ignored during this process that will determine who runs Belmont for the next 30 years.
We, like many of you, were alarmed that the memorandum of agreement between the governor and the New York Racing Association made no references to the race track’s role in the community.
The decades that NYRA has operated Belmont in a bubble has also left many with little faith that, unless mandated to, they would become the good neighbors that our communities need and our residents deserve,
The day the decision was announced, we sent a letter to Governor Spitzer that spelled out our concerns and strongly requested that the communities have a seat at the table during any decisions that were made about Belmont.
Since that time, the governor has said, both personally and publicly, that he agrees that the communities should be part of the process.
We applaud him for heeding our call.
But, make no mistake about it: We have a long way to go.
We need to make sure that these assurances are in writing and part of the final franchise agreement, which has to be approved by the state Legislature.
As your representatives in the Senate and the Assembly, we vow to make sure that the community’s needs are met in the final version of the agreement.
How the track can best benefit the community is something that should be left up to the community. Elmont is currently undergoing a visioning process designed to determine the community’s future direction.
Its relationship with Belmont, an attraction that draws thousands of people to the area, is sure to figure prominently into this plan.
We promise to work with them to make sure that their vision is taken to the state level, and becomes a reality.
In fact, the Elmont Community Coalition Council, which serves as the umbrella organization for all civic groups in the community, has put together a comprehensive, sensible list of recommendations we feel should be used as a roadmap for this new relationship. Some of these include:
• A major overhaul of the facility including new painted fencing, more attractive landscaping, sidewalk improvements, renovation of backstretch housing and educational facilities for backstretch workers and erection of lamps instead of poles surround the park and many others.
• Community participation and inclusion in the Annual Belmont Stakes and other important races as well as a celebration parade at major events.
• Economic development and tourism initiatives including high-end restaurants and shops on the grounds of the park as well as a hotel and convention center to expand the use of the grounds year- round.
• Creating an overall business and service center to generate tax revenue for the community, at the same time increasing the tax base which results in lower property taxes to homeowners.
• An iron-clad PILOT (Payment in Lieu Of Taxes) agreement guaranteeing a revenue stream from Belmont to local area governments, specifically the school districts.
Of course, the only way that we can be truly successful is if all of us, state officials, local leaders, and residents, to work together. This is not an issue that can afford to be infected by partisanship and any other difference that may divide us.
The future never is.
As representatives of the communities surrounding the Belmont Park Race Track, we remain very concerned with what appeared to have been a lack of consideration for Elmont and Floral Park in the awarding of a new state franchise for the thoroughbred franchise.
Recent events, however, have given us optimism that the communities’ voices will not be ignored during this process that will determine who runs Belmont for the next 30 years.
We, like many of you, were alarmed that the memorandum of agreement between the governor and the New York Racing Association made no references to the race track’s role in the community.
The decades that NYRA has operated Belmont in a bubble has also left many with little faith that, unless mandated to, they would become the good neighbors that our communities need and our residents deserve,
The day the decision was announced, we sent a letter to Governor Spitzer that spelled out our concerns and strongly requested that the communities have a seat at the table during any decisions that were made about Belmont.
Since that time, the governor has said, both personally and publicly, that he agrees that the communities should be part of the process.
We applaud him for heeding our call.
But, make no mistake about it: We have a long way to go.
We need to make sure that these assurances are in writing and part of the final franchise agreement, which has to be approved by the state Legislature.
As your representatives in the Senate and the Assembly, we vow to make sure that the community’s needs are met in the final version of the agreement.
How the track can best benefit the community is something that should be left up to the community. Elmont is currently undergoing a visioning process designed to determine the community’s future direction.
Its relationship with Belmont, an attraction that draws thousands of people to the area, is sure to figure prominently into this plan.
We promise to work with them to make sure that their vision is taken to the state level, and becomes a reality.
In fact, the Elmont Community Coalition Council, which serves as the umbrella organization for all civic groups in the community, has put together a comprehensive, sensible list of recommendations we feel should be used as a roadmap for this new relationship. Some of these include:
• A major overhaul of the facility including new painted fencing, more attractive landscaping, sidewalk improvements, renovation of backstretch housing and educational facilities for backstretch workers and erection of lamps instead of poles surround the park and many others.
• Community participation and inclusion in the Annual Belmont Stakes and other important races as well as a celebration parade at major events.
• Economic development and tourism initiatives including high-end restaurants and shops on the grounds of the park as well as a hotel and convention center to expand the use of the grounds year- round.
• Creating an overall business and service center to generate tax revenue for the community, at the same time increasing the tax base which results in lower property taxes to homeowners.
• An iron-clad PILOT (Payment in Lieu Of Taxes) agreement guaranteeing a revenue stream from Belmont to local area governments, specifically the school districts.
Of course, the only way that we can be truly successful is if all of us, state officials, local leaders, and residents, to work together. This is not an issue that can afford to be infected by partisanship and any other difference that may divide us.
The future never is.
Sunday, September 9, 2007
Water Tank
The civic has contacted the Town of Hempstead regarding the unacceptable, and disrespectful condition of the Water Tank, located on Hempstead Turnpike. (Picture shown)
We had been informed that Town Councilman Ed Ambrosino has contacted the Water Authority to do necessary cleaning and painting.
Several weeks had past and the water tank has not improved, not even the dirt and mold cleaned with a hose. This matter may require a more direct communication with the Water Authority to resolve a visible eye sore in the community.
Monday, September 3, 2007
Future of the Belmont Racetrack
I am astonished to hear that Governor Spitzer had ignored the Town of Hempstead and the County of Nassau to be involved in the decision process regarding the future of the Belmont Race Track in Elmont, Long Island. Take into account where the Belmont Race Track is located on the map, and it is surrounded by residential areas. Homes that have front yards, and drive ways and are owned by hard working families. Why is the State avoiding local government the public interaction of community members and leaders of the hamlets of Elmont, and the villages of South Floral Park, and Floral Park? The map published by Newsday on September 2, 2007 (Page A6, Long Island Edition) clearly displays the proximity of how changes to the racetrack will effect my quality of living, my house value, and the safety of my family, neighbors and myself.
The Belmont Race Track is one of the largest and most profound race track in the country. By coincidence, I have visited a casino in Connecticut this last weekend. I was shocked by the lack of conformity, irresponsible behavior of the workers and attendees and the near chaotic atmosphere that was witnessed. Also taking into consideration is that this casino is surrounded by undeveloped, natural land and not residential homes. If by chance that the State does choose to add casinos, did the members of the deciding board take into account the compensation that the community of Elmont deserve? Are the funds going to help compensate the school taxes? Extended programs to help children and their families be protected by the negative atmosphere that a casino could bring and have brought to other communities?
There is the issue of needing greater law enforcement in the area. We are already short on police staff at the Nassau County Fifth precinct. Just recently with a lot of effort the community and I we were able to attain ten new police officers in our local precinct. These officers were added to address the need to protect and serve our growing residential area. Changes that are proposed to the Belmont Race Track would acquire more police. This not only includes the extra needed on Hempstead Turnpike to control traffic but the need to have extra police patrol and protect the residents from individuals who would park in front of their homes. I am especially concerned for the residential homes that are just half a block away from the racetrack. Will the State or the racetrack keep our streets free of liter and compensate owners of vandalism as a result of patrons going to the Casino? Is the State looking into the well-being, and safety of the public, citizens of the State of New York, or just looking at the financial gains that State Government may acquire?
- Ruth Jakab
The Belmont Race Track is one of the largest and most profound race track in the country. By coincidence, I have visited a casino in Connecticut this last weekend. I was shocked by the lack of conformity, irresponsible behavior of the workers and attendees and the near chaotic atmosphere that was witnessed. Also taking into consideration is that this casino is surrounded by undeveloped, natural land and not residential homes. If by chance that the State does choose to add casinos, did the members of the deciding board take into account the compensation that the community of Elmont deserve? Are the funds going to help compensate the school taxes? Extended programs to help children and their families be protected by the negative atmosphere that a casino could bring and have brought to other communities?
There is the issue of needing greater law enforcement in the area. We are already short on police staff at the Nassau County Fifth precinct. Just recently with a lot of effort the community and I we were able to attain ten new police officers in our local precinct. These officers were added to address the need to protect and serve our growing residential area. Changes that are proposed to the Belmont Race Track would acquire more police. This not only includes the extra needed on Hempstead Turnpike to control traffic but the need to have extra police patrol and protect the residents from individuals who would park in front of their homes. I am especially concerned for the residential homes that are just half a block away from the racetrack. Will the State or the racetrack keep our streets free of liter and compensate owners of vandalism as a result of patrons going to the Casino? Is the State looking into the well-being, and safety of the public, citizens of the State of New York, or just looking at the financial gains that State Government may acquire?
- Ruth Jakab
Saturday, August 18, 2007
Views on Assessment
In response to the letter "Freezing Assessments Doesn't Solve Problem" found in the Three Village Times August 17, 2007 edition written by George Rand, I reply: why not?
The reason why we are having annual reassessment is because public sentiment and a court settlement was that the previous system discriminated against minority communities. Did it really fix the problem? If we examine the tax burden today, minority communities are still paying an extraordinary amount of taxes. Is this system fairer, or is the problem elsewhere?
Now comes the true litmus test of the assessment department. House values across Long Island, are currently going down. Are we going to see these changes accordingly on our assessment? Or is the assessment department only establish to increase taxes regardless? As of right now, the assessment department have the value of our homes to be increased for next year, despite current market trends. Will there be an updated assessment, or would we be getting a refund of our over payed taxes, or will the assessment department continue with the status quo?
We are currently getting assessed every year, and at what costs to the taxpayers? The assessment department can not and does not control the school budgets, the largest portion of our taxes. The question that arises then is: why do we need them? To what benefit having this assessment bring to the taxpayers? Each year, we are spending tax money to have this system in place, in the name of equality. Current house assessments are no longer unbalanced as they once were. Do we really need to continue with these annual assessments, or would biannual or 5 year assessments be more budgetary and cost effective?
Assessment will not solve the problem of our high tax burden, whether or not we have freezing assessments or not. In order to reduce the burden on tax payers, we need cost effective budgets with the smallest amount of money wasted. Removing annual reassessment in exchange for a longer term assessment could as a result reduce the tax burden by reducing the cost that reassessment has on the tax payer.
Ruth Jakab
The reason why we are having annual reassessment is because public sentiment and a court settlement was that the previous system discriminated against minority communities. Did it really fix the problem? If we examine the tax burden today, minority communities are still paying an extraordinary amount of taxes. Is this system fairer, or is the problem elsewhere?
Now comes the true litmus test of the assessment department. House values across Long Island, are currently going down. Are we going to see these changes accordingly on our assessment? Or is the assessment department only establish to increase taxes regardless? As of right now, the assessment department have the value of our homes to be increased for next year, despite current market trends. Will there be an updated assessment, or would we be getting a refund of our over payed taxes, or will the assessment department continue with the status quo?
We are currently getting assessed every year, and at what costs to the taxpayers? The assessment department can not and does not control the school budgets, the largest portion of our taxes. The question that arises then is: why do we need them? To what benefit having this assessment bring to the taxpayers? Each year, we are spending tax money to have this system in place, in the name of equality. Current house assessments are no longer unbalanced as they once were. Do we really need to continue with these annual assessments, or would biannual or 5 year assessments be more budgetary and cost effective?
Assessment will not solve the problem of our high tax burden, whether or not we have freezing assessments or not. In order to reduce the burden on tax payers, we need cost effective budgets with the smallest amount of money wasted. Removing annual reassessment in exchange for a longer term assessment could as a result reduce the tax burden by reducing the cost that reassessment has on the tax payer.
Ruth Jakab
Sunday, August 12, 2007
Blog
In order to create a more direct level of communication, the Locustwood / Gotham Civic Association has added a Blog Portal page to its main web site.
Here members can post in regard to issues pertaining to the community. This way it allows for a visible way of seeing progress; as well as an effective form of record keeping.
Headline news will still be posted on the main web page (Elmontcivic.com); but some notices will be posed on the blog portal.
We hope the members of the civic, as well as the community take advantage of the informative potential of this blog. ~XR
Here members can post in regard to issues pertaining to the community. This way it allows for a visible way of seeing progress; as well as an effective form of record keeping.
Headline news will still be posted on the main web page (Elmontcivic.com); but some notices will be posed on the blog portal.
We hope the members of the civic, as well as the community take advantage of the informative potential of this blog. ~XR
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
